Like some in the Independence / Separatist movements in Western Canada are we giving up hope for a renewed, reconciled, just, and honourable Canada1? Or are we retaining hope that Canada was and is meant to survive her divisions and conflicts? Does that hope require us and our leaders to confess, repent, and renounce the crimes, corruptions, and injustices that so many have been manipulated into endorsing or doing? Is renewal possible?
Whether one believes in prophecy or not, the values and sentiments expressed in this hope-filled podcast will undoubtedly speak to the hearts and hopes of most Canadians — Canadians who remember how much this nation has blessed the world (in spite of many moral failings over the past 50 years). Let us seek to know God's will for this nation, not by enforcing any religious dogma,2 but by each Canadian freely choosing to live in freedom and truth. May this vision for Canada prove true, as we appeal to the "Ruler Supreme" named in our National Anthem.3
If the abuses of M.A.I.D. (Medical Assistance in Dying1) in Canada were not enough to stain Canada's (once honourable) reputation, some "elites" of Canada are now abandoning property rights by encouraging the expanding claims, grievances, expectations, and corruptions of indigenous tribal leadership. Once unchecked tribal corruption by tribal elites was confined to harming their own members, but now, some Canadian governments and courts are pushing tribal boundaries outward,2 expanding the harms to the non-indigenous. It seems just one more ploy by the global elites to create divisions and fractures within and between groups and nations — using exacerbated or planned polarizations3 to destroy nations on the way to One World Domination.
As most band members know, the conditions on many of their reservations are nigh third-world DESPITE massive amounts of money flowing to tribal chiefs and councils under Treaty or other terms, but any criticism of Tribal abuse, corruption, and non-accountability is auto-labelled racism and hate speech in an attempt to short-circuit reality and accountability. But there are people of integrity and courage, both indigenous and non-indigenous, willing to expose examples of corruption, fraud, and greed where ever they surface. The following documentary shows that many indigenous elite of Canada are no different than every other elite in every other nation, kindred, tongue, tribe, and people — equally susceptible to the persuasions and corruptions of power, gain, glory, and domination. Many innocent tribal members witness and endure this sad reality every day.
Making a Killing: FULL DOCUMENTARY FILM
(Making a Killing Documentary | Dec 2, 2025 | Time 1:21:10 min.)
OneBC Caucus is proud to present Making a Killing: Reconciliation, Genocide, and Plunder in Canada. Making a Killing is a feature documentary film exposing the massive scandal behind the taking of wealth, land, and power from the Canadian public to benefit indigenous tribes. It debunks the worst lie in Canadian history: the lie that 215 bodies were found at the Kamloops Residential School and that Canadians committed a mass murder against indigenous children. Making a Killing is the first documentary film produced by an elected caucus": at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSRn8BzpvLc&t=2529s
This criticism of indigenous elites is not to ignore that many offenses have occured, past and present, in their dealings with governments and other Canadians, but if their own people felt able to speak without fear of reprisal, what would many say about the administration of Treaty monies and responsibilities? about race-based privilege and exemption that corrupt the hopes and possibilities for reconciliation (as a New Brunswick court just observed4)? Can the indigenous activist (circa 1:15:50 min) not hear the parallel in this statement: "You know we have serious issues here with [indigenous] supremist notions and racism ..."?
When will we Canadians (indigenous, native-born, and immigrant to this great land) recognize and reject the gas-fogging and GASing ploys of WO boys and girls? Yes, we have differences of opinion, perspective, culture, etc., but the solution is not to criminalize the asking of questions or the insistence for evidence in proving narratives or seeking accountability for the use of tribal monies. The solution is not to make secret agreements for reconciliation (being the very antithesis of reconciliation).
For the most part, Tribal chiefs and councils know how corrosive the reservation (collectivist) system has become; how easy to dominate and control with fear; how easy to abuse power and privilege; how susceptible to corruption and self-service. Until the Tribal elite and their castigated "white, colonialist elites" recognize and reject the follies of their human nature, the GASing of Canada will undoubtedly continue.
Nonetheless , let us continue to pray for Canada, her indigenous, her native-born, and her immigrants. She and they are worth protecting as equals — worth remembering that the cognitive distortions of "black and white thinking" lead only to error and hostility. Until we can both admit that colonialism has both blessed and harmed, we will never reconcile our history or our peoples.
The rights and freedoms that the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) did not sustain in the JB Peterson case of 2023-24,1 were honored this past week by the UCP (United Conservative Party) of Alberta when announcing The Jordan B. Peterson Law:
Over the past five years especially, there has been an escalating culture of coercion — a knee-jerk response to questioners or skeptics of trending dogmas, whether Woke. COVID, Climate, etc. The world has witnessed numerous attempts to cancel, disparage, fire, or de-license critical thinkers if they did not bow to narrative stories. With a Heroes and Hydras blog,2 I began to highlight some of those unbelievable injustices by licensing bodies — injustices that were documented during the National Citizens Inquiry of Canada (NCI).3 The SCC did not appear to be listening to the lessons of the NCI when they affirmed a very public coercion of Jordan Peterson.
But finally, Alberta has taken the lead in putting a stumbling block in the path of authoritarian licensing bodies who have taken upon themselves to punish and re-align thought, belief, opinion, and speech that does not conform to their thought, belief, and opinion. The Jordan Peterson appeal4 was a classic case of fighting bully culture. That legislation should be required to hedge against such authoritarianism is unfortunate, but THANK YOU Alberta for resisting the tyranny of so many licensing bodies. May every province take up the torch of aggressively protecting free and critical thought, opinion, belief, and expression.
Perhaps we should all be more assertive in demanding that all bodies answer: "By What Authority?"5
Just a reminder for those who love information, books, and factual history: the prolific output of Peter Duke of The Duke Report continues at an ever accelerating pace. His new "Book Explainer" series is a short course in facts, concepts, and insights that most of us wish we had more time to pursue. Here is his introduction for the "Explainer" series. Most of the other "Explainer" episodes are 6 to 8 minutes long and packed with summary. I find the AI voice in these solo presentations much preferable to the conversational presentations in some of his other offerings. The amount of information in the Explainer series is amazing.
What a great springboard series to launch us into further reading of those books that spark our interest and that present us with a "cloud of witnesses" that we ignore at our peril.
My take: Another valuable documentary by James Corbett detailing how often peoples, societies, and governments, seduced by authoritarian, Utopian ideologies, project their own madness onto dissenters. Instead of taking the upward course of self-correcting, progressing, improving through dialogue and self-criticism, the low road of projection and persecution is taken by the authoritarians and their servitors.
On this 80th Anniversary of Hiroshima (August 6) and Nagasaki (August 9), let us revisit the evidence as detailed in a recent publication (May 11, 2025) by Dr. Michael Palmer (Author), Dr. Franklin Stahl (Foreword), titled:
Hiroshima Revisited:
The evidence that napalm and mustard gas helped fake the nuclear bombings1
A summary of the book can be found at The Duke Report (Reference Library2), a portion of which reads:
Hiroshima Revisited by Michael Palmer, MD scrutinizes the prevailing narrative of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings by systematically analyzing physical, medical, and historical evidence. Palmer constructs a detailed alternative chronology of events, exposing the mechanisms, motivations, and outcomes that shaped the public understanding of the so-called atomic age.
Unveiling the Historical Premise
Palmer asserts that the destruction witnessed in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki days later, resulted from an operation employing conventional weapons, incendiaries, and chemical agents, rather than nuclear devices. He traces the origins of the atomic narrative to a convergence of wartime secrecy, postwar propaganda, and selective presentation of scientific data. The book launches with a careful assessment of the timeline: the discovery of nuclear fission in 1938, the subsequent development of uranium enrichment technologies, and the ostensible Manhattan Project achievements.
He frames his inquiry by engaging the doubts voiced by early nuclear physicists such as Werner Heisenberg, who found the reported rapid progression from theory to a deployable atomic weapon highly implausible. Palmer investigates the pace of scientific progress within the Manhattan Project, referencing documented trial-and-error experiments, late-stage uncertainties in bomb design, and the technical obstacles to achieving bomb-grade uranium enrichment by 1945.
The Duke Report summary concludes with:
Enduring Impact and Call to Inquiry
Palmer concludes by challenging readers to approach historical narratives with skepticism and analytical rigor. He advocates for transparency, open debate, and the restoration of empirical inquiry in the assessment of major world events. He calls attention to the risks inherent in the uncritical acceptance of official stories and underscores the need for independent verification in science and history alike.
He presents Hiroshima Revisited as a catalyst for re-examining foundational stories of the modern era. The book stands as a detailed case study in the interplay of evidence, authority, and belief—a structural invitation to re-evaluate the history and meaning of the atomic age.
For anyone wishing to re-examine narratives and foundational stories, you will find The Duke Report3 and his Reference Library4 an unmatched resource.
22 For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was any thing kept secret, but that it should come abroad.1
17 There is nothing which is secret save it shall be revealed; there is no work of darkness save it shall be made manifest in the light; and there is nothing which is sealed upon the earth save it shall be loosed.2
3 And the rebellious shall be pierced with much sorrow; for their iniquities shall be spoken upon the housetops, and their secret acts shall be revealed.3
And IF our secret acts were also broadcast as on a mega-tron, what would we feel and do? Seriously imagine, before it is too late.
These warnings and promises of exposure should be of special interest to lawyers / judges,4 P3s,5intelligence / investigative agencies,6 and all the other R.I.C.E.-captured7 facilitators of crime, corruption, shame, and guilt.
-------------------------------------/ 1. New Testament | Mark 4:22–23; Luke 8:17 2. Book of Mormon | 2 Nephi 30:17 3. Doctrine and Covenants | Section 1:3 4. Book of Mormon | Alma 10:27 27 And now behold, I say unto you, that the foundation of the destruction of this people is beginning to be laid by the unrighteousness of your lawyers and your judges.
Book of Mormon | 3 Nephi 6:27-30 27 Now it came to pass that those judges had many friends and kindreds; and the remainder, yea, even almost all the lawyers and the high priests, did gather themselves together, and unite with the kindreds of those judges who were to be tried according to the law. 28 And they did enter into a covenant one with another, yea, even into that covenant which was given by them of old, which covenant was given and administered by the devil, to combine against all righteousness. 29 Therefore they did combine against the people of the Lord, and enter into a covenant to destroy them, and to deliver those who were guilty of murder from the grasp of justice, which was about to be administered according to the law. 30 And they did set at defiance the law and the rights of their country; and they did covenant one with another to destroy the governor, and to establish a king over the land, that the land should no more be at liberty but should be subject unto kings. 5. https://moc-n-dox.blogspot.com/2022/05/paving-road-to-serfdom-bb-bg-partnershi.html 6. latest examples of fortressing the cork (e.g.: JEpstein, “Liedaho4”) that would otherwise explode and expose unimaginable depths of crime and corruption, all in pursuit of power, gain, glory, and domination. 7. R.I.C.E.-capture: Reward.Ideology.Coercion[|Corruption|Compromise].Ego.
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-price-of-rice.html
Further to my post of March 20, 2025, Saving Canada: A Message to Albertans & all Canadians,1 here are some observations about the (unofficial) showing2 for the newish Republican Party of Alberta (RPA) from three by-elections this week.
Alberta is no stranger to conservative fragmenting and frequent discontent with those in power (often with good reason), but what should we make of this newish, allegedly conservative Republican Party of Alberta? Their wiki page3 contains this:
Ideology • Alberta separatism • Pro-Americanism • Conservatism • Fiscal conservatism Political position Right-wing[2] Colours Red
Now what follows is just my opinion, so take it or leave it — without a blood-pressure incident!
First, I think they made a mistake in their colour choice of red. The same mistake that the U.S. Republicans made many years ago.4 Red is not the colour of conservative blue and has a seriously strong connection with the opposite ideology.5
Second, the colour-blind mistake has been compounded by a tone-deafness in the name of their party. I would lay odds that most independent-, separatist-prone Albertans are not “pro-Americanism” (aka USianism) nor Republican in the way the RPA might imagine in their dreams and chats. Yes, there are a lot of fine USians south of our border with a fantastic Constitution and Bill of Rights that have inspired the world, BUT, (and it’s a big BUT) if one knows the underbelly of their history6 over the past 100 years or so, one knows they have become a seriously hypocritical nation, whether headed by Republicans or Democrats.7 (Blood pressure?) The USians have allowed their governments to mock their Constitution and Rights time after time without demanding full exposure and accountability — re-electing the same offenders, time after time.. (You know, rather like we Canadians with our governments and Constitution!) The whole of North America is in precipitous decline, and clamming, like a barnacle, onto the sinking ship of the U.S.A. is not a thinking (wo)man’s idea of swimming free. To pursue another metaphor: if we can’t save the current frying pan of Canada, leaping into the inferno of our southern neighbour is exponentially worse. If we are forced to swim free, let’s swim on our own, or synchronize with Saskatchewan (and maybe Manitoba and BC) if all else fails. But first, let us make an honest, persistent, vociferous effort to renegotiate Confederation. And let us not imagine that the name Republican,8 in this day and age, is a thing to print on our foreheads.
Third, why is conservative Alberta always fighting to split the conservative vote? Or are these just pretend conservatives? Or do they consider themselves bluer than blue such that they only see red when their right-ideology is watered down past their liking or ego? Dividing conservatives does nothing but elect the opposition.
Fourth, Do the Alberta Republicans imagine they can escape the hubris, corruption, honey-potting, and self-serving — the R.I.C.E.9 fest — that dances about every power structure. The “sins” they lament in others are already at their party.
Open Letter to the 85 “independent [faux?] candidates”1 of Carleton Ontario riding and the
“invited” candidates of Battle River-Crowfoot Alberta riding,2 and all other “invited” Canadians.
Greetings Fellow Canadians:
Surely, many of you have observed, especially in the past six years, how consistently the principles and values of democracy and rights and freedoms have been mocked worldwide by those in positions of power and / or influence; how agendas and ideologies have been used to excuse and justify unethical, unconstitutional, and criminal actions. Scandal upon scandal have been clearly exposed, yet ignored or buried such that justice and judgment (the bedrock of free nations) have been repeatedly betrayed and mocked. So these are my questions to:
a) the 85 “protest” (pretend?) candidates of the Carleton Ontario riding3;
b) the 100+ “qualified,” Carleton-riding electors4 who consented to 85 nominations;
c) the soon-to-be faux candidates and their “consenting electors” from Battle River-Crowfoot; and
d) every other riding that has or will be tempted to participate in a future, long-ballot “protest.”
1. Why would any honest Canadian agree to become a fake candidate?
2. Why would anyone sully their name in an abusive mockery of the electoral process?
3. Why would anyone with integrity consent to endorse or be agent for a pretend candidate?
4. Why would Tomas or Kieran Szuchewycz5 (the long-ballot boys6) think they (or any of their faux-reform7 colleagues) could be trusted with changing or administering a (yes, much needed) reformed Canadian electoral process when they have taken pride in abuse of process?
5. Why would any adult be so obtuse as to believe that Marxist / Leninist ideologues (Tom & Kieran Szuchewycz8) are pro-democracy and have genuine interest in reforming for electoral integrity?
6. Could Tom and Kieran be manifesting (whether witting or unwitting) as World Order (WO) or WEFian assets? (being a mix of duper and dupee?) — pretending to advocate for a better democracy, just like pretend candidates?
7. Why would any thinking Canadian allow Tom or Kieran or any other person to talk them into putting their name, address, and phone # on a public document which name is then published on a paper ballot and on the internet to stand as a forever witness that they willingly participated in an egregious mockery of democracy?
8. What was or would be the MOTIVATION to tarnish ones name and reputation at the request of Marxist-Leninist ideologues? Might it, once again, be R.I.C.E.9?
So, please, fellow Canadians, if you know any of the faux candidates, or their 100+ qualified, consenting electors, perhaps you could (very politely) ask them what the price of their R.I.C.E. was? If you live in the Battle River-Crowfoot Alberta riding, and hear about a faux candidate or his/her “sponsor,” or agent, politely ask them their R.I.C.E. motivation for agreeing to this mocking of democracy? Ask if they meant to buddy-up with a Marxist / Leninist sympathizer? Tell them it is not too late (yet) to withdraw their name and complicity. Tell them that the gas-lighting (bka gas-fogging10) of democratic nations will not end until seeing we see and hearing we hear the truth behind the lies of Utopian (Marxist / Leninist, et al.) dupes and dupers.
And last, but not least, let us ask ourselves individually: Have we become so compromised in integrity that we can be so easily duped and gas-fogged into mocking the democracy that has blessed our nation for so many years; a democracy that tens of thousands from other nations aspire to call home; a democracy that has been and is being undermined by the gas-fogging of faux reformers; by corrupted, unaccountable EOs, AppOs. judges, enforcers, educators, et al.; and their many sycophants.
Yes, democracy, especially corrupted democracy, has its flaws and needs reform, but the naiveté of thinking that an “independent” group is less susceptible to R.I.C.E. in contorting and distorting justice and judgment and electoral choices is a recipe for more dystopian nightmares of the Marxist / Leninist variety. Have we learned nothing from history?
In short, these long-ballot “protesters” are pied-pipers on the game board of dystopian Revolution. Have the Szuchewycz brothers not proven themselves as the opposite of non-partisan11? In déjà vu of almost all Revolutions, what the dreamers claim is not what they intend or, in time, implement. Everything is subterfuge.
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us." (OT:Ecclesiastes 1:9-10)
"Dwell in the past and you'll lose an eye. Forget the past and you'll lose both eyes." (Old Russian Proverb)
(Subject to change over time: experience/learning/ evidence)
▪ Life is a three-act drama with pre-mortal, mortal, and post-mortal stages. ▪ The second act boils us down toward test one:[1] the test of power. ▪ Abusers of power lose it in Act Three when justice and equity take the bench. ▪ Tipping points happen—over time and a fulcrum. ▪ Motes and beams are everywhere.[2] ▪ Folly is a shadow of every ism, including capitalism. ▪ Money talks louder than morals—all the way to the tipping point. ▪ The direction you are facing, matters.[3] ▪ Extremism in the defense of liberty is extremism.[4] ▪ When the blind follow the blind, it is time to blow the whistle.[5] ▪ Opposites attract the same lobbyists. ▪ Solon of Athens espoused, “Nothing in excess;” laissez-faire capitalists pursue “Everything in excess” (except the costs of gross profit). ▪ “Simplify” displayed on the counter-top of a new 21,000 sq. ft. home does not compute. ▪ High fructose corn syrup is not the staff of life. Unfortunately, sweets can twirl your teeth. ▪ Revolving doors between government and business do not admit sufficient fresh air. ▪ The common good doesn’t seem to be very common. ▪ N. American football is a testosterone pageant in tights.[6] ▪ Exploitation is a delusion of grandeur. Stewardship is a grander conclusion. ▪ The excesses of major religions occur when members fail their espoused values. The excesses of ideological tyrannies occur when tyrants act upon theirs.[7] ▪ Praise is best deflected toward God. ▪ Too many who say, “I do, I do,” don’t. ▪ Electronic media has become the Roman Coliseum of the 21st Century. ▪ The First Law of Attraction[8]: the Devil is more obsessed with persons striving to do and be good than with persons who are not. ▪ The trans-rational[9] is beyond most of us, so if it’s “turtles all the way down,”[10] maybe it is “revelation all the way up.”[11] ▪ Egoism accounts for 80% of human problems. The remaining 27% lies with rhetoric and propaganda.
In the near words of Groucho Marx, “These are my [views]; if you don’t like them, I have others.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [1]New Testament: Matt. 4:2-4—The first temptation presented to Jesus, to misuse His power to satisfy self-interest/-will/-gratification. [2] Ref: Matthew 7:3-5 [3]Old Testament: Jer. 32:33 [4] A Barry Goldwater phrase “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” A phrase applauded by some of the GOP. (Suggestion: reverse liberty and justice to see if it sounds more palatable, or is the latter half merely castor-oil for the first?) [5] Ref: Matthew 15:14 [6] Observation of a friend, MS, who wishes to remain anonymous for obvious reasons. [7] Ref: Ravi Zacharias [8] Ref: Adam & Eve; Biblical Job; Jesus in the Wilderness; CS Lewis’ Screwtape Letters, etc., etc., etc. [9] Ref: Flatland by Edwin Abbott. In summary, circles, squares and other flatlanders can’t get a fix on spheres and cubes; can’t quite reason themselves into the properties of those in 3-D space. Enlightenment of things beyond (i.e., trans-) Flatland takes condescension from those above & beyond. Any parallels here in 3-D? [10]Google this phrase if you have not heard of it. It’s just one way of saying we don’t have a rational explanation for some things. [11] Conditional on the will of the Revelator and the willingness/ ability of the revelatee to receive.
About SMS
A few 6-to-7-Word Memoirs: ▪ Hope for the world comes and goes. ▪ Loves to read more than eat. ▪ Loves to think more than eat. ▪ Eats too much while reading and thinking. ▪ Always running out of time and daylight. ▪ Finds extremes too far from the center. ▪ Troubled by the world’s failure of memory. ▪ Has a tendency to counsel God. ▪ Learned gratitude before it was too late. ▪ Apparently hasn't learned enough gratitude yet.
3) People are free to post divergent or convergent views on their own blogs; 4) Learning from comments here would be preferable, but— (see 1, 2, & 3).
EU Cookie Notice
This blogger does not use cookies. Because “blogspot” is owned and serviced by Google, Google may use cookies and here are three sites that explain Google's use and policies: https://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/technologies/cookies/ ; https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/ ; https://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/partners/
Blog Title Credit
*"This is like déjà vu all over again" is perhaps the most perfect tautology possible and is credited to Yogi Berra.
