By What Authority??

(This exact email was sent in batches to 587 national and provincial public servants throughout Canada on May 1, 2021.)

To All Public Servants, provincial and national concerning:

Sitting Member of Parliament Threatened with Jail Time and Massive Fines!¹

PLUS numerous other recent infractions of inalienable rights and freedoms.

By what authority do public servants act when threatening or censoring speech and opinion of other elected officials or others who do not share their opinions or narrative beliefs? when: arresting pastors? harassing congregations? “jailing” church buildings? forbidding good Samaritan deeds? fining or changing locks on legitimate businesses? assaulting non-maskers? forcing quarantine of travelers in hotels or other facilities? ticketing peaceful protesters? causing wrong or harm or trespass? etc., etc. The abuses² by “alleged authority” are escalating and alarming.

“By what authority” under the:

▪ Emergencies Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp.))
AND WHEREAS the Governor in Council, in taking such special temporary measures, would be subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ;and the Canadian Bill of Rights and must have regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, particularly with respect to those fundamental rights that are not to be limited or abridged even in a national emergency;³

▪ Criminal Code - R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46 (Section 176)
Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman
176 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who (a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or endeavours to obstruct or prevent an officiant from celebrating a religious or spiritual service or performing any other function in connection with their calling, or Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings
(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.⁴

▪ United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights
[Two examples of 30]
Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. {Vaxxers vs. Non-vaxxers?]
Article 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.⁵

▪ Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms⁶

▪ Canadian Bill of Rights (S.C. 1960, c. 44)
Recognition and declaration of rights and freedoms
1 It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,
(a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
(b) the right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the law;
(c) freedom of religion;
(d) freedom of speech;
(e) freedom of assembly and association; and
(f) freedom of the press.⁷

▪ Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-10) (and other police oaths)
Oaths
14 (1) Every member shall, before entering on the duties of the member’s office, take the oath of allegiance and the oaths set out in the schedule.
SCHEDULE(Section 14)
Oath of Office
I, ________________, solemnly swear that I will faithfully, diligently and impartially execute and perform the duties required of me as a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and will well and truly obey and perform all lawful orders and instructions that I receive as such, without fear, favour or affection of or toward any person. So help me God.⁸

▪ Lessons from the Nuremberg Trials and Principles
“I was just following my superior's orders”.⁹

 Why are “authorities” putting enforcement personnel at risk for personal liability and criminal prosecution by ordering them to violate their service oaths and surety bonds in unlawful interference with inalienable rights and freedoms of the public recognized and encoded in both national and international law?

And lastly, have PHOs and their bosses complied with the PCR cycle threshold reporting guidelines¹⁰ and if not, why not? Enabling erroneous case counts is not acceptable and may incur civil and / or criminal liability. 

Sincerely,

SMSmith

----------------------------/

1. https://action4canada.com/update-actions-and-information-april-28th-2021/
2. https://action4canada.com/update-actions-and-information-april-28th-2021/
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/04/open-letter-to-reverend-greg.html
https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-new-normal-samaritan.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/01/bully-culture.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/03/a-gift-horse.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-people-of-non-consent.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/02/headlines-from-hell.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/11/against-conscience.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/11/a-brief-analysis-of-edmonton-city.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/12/open-letter-to-premier-brian-of-manitoba.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/08/coup-detat-of-labcoats.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-global-stanley-milgram-experiment.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/04/real-life-milgram-spe.html
3. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-1.html?wbdisable=true (Bold emphasis added)
4. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/Search/Search.aspx?txtS3archA11=religious&txtT1tl3=%22Criminal+Code%22&h1ts0n1y=0&ddC0nt3ntTyp3=Acts
5. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
6. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/
7. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/FullText.html
8. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/r-10/page-23.html#h-422682 (Bold emphasis added.)

9. Nuremberg Principle I 

Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment. ... 

Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law, acted as Head of State or responsible government official, does not relieve him from responsibility under international law. ...
Principle IV
Main article: Superior orders
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'". ...
Principle VI ...
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles (Italic emphasis added.)

10. PCR Cycle Thresholds: (Bold emphasis added.)

“The FDA has given lab manufacturers a wide latitude in determining the cycle threshold cut-off number of their qualitative tests to determine positive versus negative. These tests were approved under Emergency Use Authorization and have not been subjected to typical FDA scrutiny. With this in mind, the state of Florida has required all laboratories doing COVID testing to report the cycle threshold numbers used in qualitative and quantitative tests.

“So how does a qualitative RT-PCR test work? Basically, the manufacturer sets the test to turn off the cycling or amplification process when a certain number is hit. For a qualitative test set at 40, after 40 amplification cycles, if any viral material is detected, it turns off and is reported as positive. If none is detected, it would be reported as negative. If the number of amplification cycles was really 15 or 25, it would still run until it gets to 40 and be reported as positive.

“With these type of tests, it's critical to use an agreed-upon cycle threshold value such as 33 (CDC) or 35 (Dr. Fauci) rather than setting it at a potentially misleading 40 or 45. Many of the current tests in use are preset by the manufacturer to these higher numbers.

“The World Health Organization issued a notice last week telling the labs "the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise." Could this be a reason why many people test positive but remain asymptomatic? In that same memo, WHO said all labs should report the cycle threshold value to treating physicians.” at https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90508

 

BONUS: https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/10/corruption-by-design.html