Friday, May 21, 2021

The Fake Trustworthy?

(aka: Checking the Fact-Checkers?)

Recently, I received this reply from an elected official (EO):
“I always encourage people who write into our office to be conscious of where the information is coming from. Canada is not immune from hostile states like China attempting to sow discontent in our society by sharing questionable or partially accurate information. A review of the Children’s Health Defence[1] shows it was founded by primarily lawyers with ties to the anti-Alberta energy lobby in the US, promoting primarily alternative health care and who has been labelled by fact checking organizations as “quackery-level pseudo-scientific” and banned by Facebook for suggesting that 5G networks are causing COVID-19. This would not be a trusted source on the issue.”
What is staggering is how naïve(?) this EO seems to be about the reality of truth suppression, distortion, corruption, and propaganda in history.2 Preemptive strategy3 is the forever script and pattern of those who pursue and protect power, gain, and glory. A classic preemption is to set-up front organizations touting themselves as independent, trustworthy, benevolent groups devoted to the best interests of humanity, truth, ethics, mother earth, etc., etc., when in reality they are primarily the opposite. Another favored tactic is to infiltrate legitimate organizations and mis-use them to libel and disparage whistle-blowers or truth-seekers. Another is called “controlled oppostion.”4 So the fake-trustworthy tell lies and the real-trustworthy are accused of lies. A perfect set-up for mind- and mass-control.

Recall Bill Casey, former CIA director?5
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public [read: the world] believes is false."
So here are some questions for the EO: What is the background of your fact-checkers? What is the source of their income? Do they consistently support the pro-power narrative? Has their credibility ever been compromised? As for Facebook and giants: When has banning ever helped the truth debate? Why are accusers so often sparse on proofs and so generous with labels like “quackery-level pseudo-scientific”? And why do pro-power fact-checkers seem so oblivious to historical voices,6 parallels, and confessions of deceptive schemes? 

Since much of what we hear, read, and see on the MSM (and many front organizations) supports the pro-power narrative, the historical odds favor the headlines being the inverse of truth, so here are three ways to perhaps come closer to truth:
▪ invert the message of the MSM headline;
▪ seek out sites or headlines that challenge the approved narrative (e.g.: Children's Health Defence7);
▪ research the exposés that are being banned.
So, yes, EO, there are hostile states like China, but we are exponentially more at risk from home-grown propaganda dupes, shills, sycophants, and naïve believers than foreign actors. That is the unfortunate, blunt, historical truth.

So please consider this:


Who Will Fact Check the Fact Checkers
(The Corbett Report Subscriber | June 19, 2020 | Time 54:18) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkoogDw1PxI&t=710s or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkoogDw1PxI
If censored by YouTube, find this at: https://www.corbettreport.com/who-will-fact-check-the-fact-checkers/
Added May 24, 2021: Many credible counter-narrative voices broadcasting this entire week at https://thegreaterreset.org/ including RFK, Jr., Dolores Cahill, Richard Grove, etc. PLEASE tune in or listen to the replays in several languages.

----------------------------------------/
1. Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
2. ▪ Edward Bernays: “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”
(Source: https://www.amazon.com/Propaganda-Edward-Bernays-ebook/dp/B0097D76MG/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2NLE7CZI9MORU&keywords=propaganda+bernays&qid=1570053969&sprefix=propaganda%2Caps%2C210&sr=8-1  |  “Edward Bernays (1891–1995), pioneered the scientific technique of shaping and manipulating public opinion, which he famously dubbed “engineering of consent.” During World War I, he was an integral part of the U.S. Committee on Public Information (CPI), a powerful propaganda apparatus that was mobilized to package, advertise and sell the war to the American people as one that would “Make the World Safe for Democracy.” The CPI would become the blueprint in which marketing strategies for future wars would be based upon. // Bernays applied the techniques he had learned in the CPI and, incorporating some of the ideas of Walter Lipmann, became an outspoken proponent of propaganda as a tool for democratic and corporate manipulation of the population.”
▪ Hitler; ... the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X[1] at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie
▪ How the CIA Paid and Threatened Journalists to Do Its Work Updated Jul. 12, 2017 8:23PM ET / Published Oct. 14, 2016 https://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/10/14/how-the-cia-paid-and-threatened-journalists-to-do-its-work
▪ CIA'S USE OF JOURNALISTS AND CLERGY IN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf
▪ Operation Mockingbird: What Exactly Is It, Here are Facts You Need To Know https://wiki.projecttopics.org/29061-operation-mockingbird-what-exactly-is-it-here-are-facts-you-need-to-know/index.html
▪ Operation Mockingbird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird [As usual, Wiki plays its part in the preemption game.]
▪ Plus research books and documentaries about mind-control, propaganda, psy-op, manufactured consent, etc. such as the excellent The Minds of Men | Official Documentary by Aaron & Melissa Dykes (Truthstream Media) (Time 3:42:34) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQucESRF3Sg  If this link disappears from YouTube, find it at the TSM website at http://truthstreammedia.com/ or perhaps access it in an apparently shorter version at Vimeo On Demand at https://vimeo.com/ondemand/themindsofmen/
3. Preemptive: taken as a measure against something possible, anticipated, or feared; preventive; deterrent: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/preemptive
4. Controlled opposition: A controlled opposition is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries. Notably Vladimir Lenin who said ''"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Controlled%20opposition
5. "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false" ~ Wm. Casey (former CiA director: 1981-1987)
*SOURCE: Greg Smith, ... Answered September 22, 2014
Originally Answered: Did William Casey (CIA Director) really say: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false"?
Ex-DCI Bill Casey's quote was attributed online as reported only by Mae Brussell, and so, I bounced it off Barbara Honegger because I knew she worked for Mae B back in the day, and here's what I got on the ACTUAL SOURCE (talk about luck! - I extracted actual email addresses):
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Barbara Honegger
Date: Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: Conference on THE WARREN REPORT AND THE
JFK ASSASSINATION : FIVE DECADES OF
SIGNIFICANT DISCLOSURES
To: Greg Smith
I told Mae about it when we worked together ...
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
Thanks Barbara! That's priceless. The web attributes it to Mae B only, and therefore, it's discounted in chat and group conversations on social media. You might want to give it better street cred? Your call!
On Sep 21, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Barbara Honegger wrote:
» Seriously -- I personally was the Source
» for that William Casey quote. He said it
» at an early Feb. 1981 meeting in the
» Roosevelt Room in the West Wing of
» the White House which I attended, and
» I immediately told my close friend and
» political godmother Senior White House
» Correspondent Sarah McClendon, who
» then went public with it without naming
» the source ...
from https://www.quora.com/Did-CIA-Director-William-Casey-really-say-Well-know-our-disinformation-program-is-complete-when-everything-the-American-public-believes-is-false
6. https://voices-from-the-dust.blogspot.com/
7. Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

There's a Link, You Say!! You Think?


“Jagmeet Singh says there's a link between anti-maskers and far-right extremism(The Canadian Press headline)

TO: Jagmeet Singh, Rachel Notley, Justin Trudeau, Jason Kenney, Naheed Nenshi, (Theresa Tam, Deena Hinshaw), The Canadian Press, CBC, and all the other Canadian and global script readers.

Let's take this Canadian Press (CP) headline story1 and follow the alleged link[s] from both sides of the divide as in the CP side versus the HP (Historical Press) side!

CP: “Jagmeet Singh says there's a link between anti-maskers and far-right extremism.”

HP: Except the science and history of power proves the real link is between order-following maskers and far-winged (L or R) totalitarian regimes.2 (Consider Étienne de La Boétie!3)

CP: Jagmeet Singh says "To brazenly not follow public health guidelines puts people at risk and that is something that we've seen with extreme right-wing ideology."

HP: Except to blindly follow public health guidelines [based on unsubstantiated, unscientific word, opinion, belief, flawed testing, flawed modelling, etc., etc.4 of deceived or complicit authorities and experts] puts people at risk and that is something we've seen with extreme-winged ideology and with numerous historical tyrannical regimes.

CP: “Singh said some of the people being drawn to recent protests are affiliated with far-right groups.”

HP: Except the science and history of power proves most of the people who are isolating, masking, vaxxing, snitching, trusting MSM & narrative-driven authorities, etc., etc., are being fear-driven with promises of safety and security by order-followers of deceptive, control-obsessed powers.

CP: [Jagmeet] “said he sees a link between those refusing to follow public-health advice and the ideologies of the extreme right because both show a disregard for the well-being of others and put people at risk.”

HP: Except the science and history of power proves there is a solid link between those blindly following public-health advice and the ideologies [and agendas] of extreme-wings because both show a disregard for the present and future well-being of others and put people at extreme risk of losing personal autonomy and integrity by surviving a highly survivable disease.5

CP: “Singh said refusing to listen to COVID-19 health orders is dangerous and needs to be called out.” 

HP: Except the science and history of power abuse proves that refusing to acknowledge prolific evidence that undermines health orders and assumptions AS IN:6
1) lab origin of COVID and its variants;
2) existence of COVID patents;
3) unproven efficacy of masks and mandates;
4) media saturation of pscience7 claims & opinions over science facts;
5) non-reporting of cycle threshold values can greatly exacerbate case counts;8
6) ignoring motives for and ease of deliberate contamination and transmission;
7) the “do-nothing” crisis strategy for symptomatics, except for orders “to isolate and if you get worse, go at the hospital”;9
8) denial of prophylactics like Ivermectin;10 etc.
is dangerous and highly unethical and needs to be called out.

As to Mayor Naheed's complaint against "thinly veiled white nationalist, supremacist anti-government protests"science, history, and observation prove that resisters to tyranny and mendacity come from every nation, race, and tongue. Many resisters know the science and history of the obsessive pursuit and abuse of power. They see COVID 19 for what it is: the déjà vu use of disease and fear to achieve mind-numbing control.

And in compliance with their Bernaysian,11 scripted, psy-op role, the CP, CBC, and others finish up with this added link of implied “hate”:
CP: “And last month, a deputy director of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network noted more conspiracy theorists and far-right groups were attaching themselves to the anti-lockdown and anti-mask movement.”
So, the strategy is: if you can't negatively label peaceful resisters, then negatively link them12 and soon, order-followers will see all resisters as dangerous heretics opposing the “one and only allowed” narrative.

Bonus word of caution to order-followers and script readers: Be sure that no one brings up the 1960s experiments of Stanley Milgram.13

So, I end with this email plea to the addressees: It is tragic that none of you seem able to process history or to have the courage to expose the lies and crimes or to end the cruelty that has been scripted for you. Except, no matter what your reason for blindness or complicity, you still have choice to end “not seeing.”

Sincerely,
SMSmith

[This is a copy of an email sent May 12, 2021 to the addressees (except for Theresa & Deena for whom I do not have email addresses) with CCs to Canadian Ministers of Justice & Health and Alberta Ministers of Justice, Health, & Assoc. Min. of  Mental Health, and an Alberta RCMP official.]

[Added here: belated apology for the repetitions, but the CP article itself could have been said in two sentences, but in keeping with psy-op / propaganda strategy, complicit media has been trained to repeat an opinion so many times it presents as truth.14

------------------------------------------/
1. Jagmeet Singh says there's a link between anti-maskers and far-right extremism |  The Canadian Press · Posted: May 10, 2021 at https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/jagmeet-singh-anti-mask-far-right-1.6020777?ref=mobilerss&cmp=newsletter_CBC%20News%20Top%20Headlines%20%20%E2%80%93%20Morning_1613_265440
2. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2009/09/are-we-there-yet-at-t-point.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-t-point.html
Also see; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism
5. See footnote 4 references
6. See footnote references in footnotes 4, 8, 12.
Also: https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/02/25/latest-news-296/
7. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/10/pscience.html
8. ▪ PCR Testing Saga: Were We Duped? Were federal health officials and experts at WHO really unaware that the recommended high cycle count (CT) for PCR tests would produce an exorbitant number of false positives for COVID? by Dr. Joseph Mercola (Childrens' Health Defense | Feb. 23, 2021) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b2c12bbb-ac81-4cb4-9987-6f4bd15c26f0
PCR Cycle Thresholds: (Bold emphasis added.)
“The FDA has given lab manufacturers a wide latitude in determining the cycle threshold cut-off number of their qualitative tests to determine positive versus negative. These tests were approved under Emergency Use Authorization and have not been subjected to typical FDA scrutiny. With this in mind, the state of Florida has required all laboratories doing COVID testing to report the cycle threshold numbers used in qualitative and quantitative tests.
“So how does a qualitative RT-PCR test work? Basically, the manufacturer sets the test to turn off the cycling or amplification process when a certain number is hit. For a qualitative test set at 40, after 40 amplification cycles, if any viral material is detected, it turns off and is reported as positive. If none is detected, it would be reported as negative. If the number of amplification cycles was really 15 or 25, it would still run until it gets to 40 and be reported as positive.
“With these type of tests, it's critical to use an agreed-upon cycle threshold value such as 33 (CDC) or 35 (Dr. Fauci) rather than setting it at a potentially misleading 40 or 45. Many of the current tests in use are preset by the manufacturer to these higher numbers. “The World Health Organization issued a notice last week telling the labs "the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise." Could this be a reason why many people test positive but remain asymptomatic? In that same memo, WHO said all labs should report the cycle threshold value to treating physicians.” at https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90508
9. Alberta Weekly Newspaper Association submitted article to its members, titled “End Lockdowns with Early Treatment for Covid-19” | published May 6, 2021 by some member papers. Source not yet found online.
10. https://earlytreatment.ca/
https://earlytreatment.ca/letter-to-premier-kenney
11. “Edward Bernays (1891–1995), pioneered the scientific technique of shaping and manipulating public opinion, which he famously dubbed “engineering of consent.” During World War I, he was an integral part of the U.S. Committee on Public Information (CPI), a powerful propaganda apparatus that was mobilized to package, advertise and sell the war to the American people as one that would “Make the World Safe for Democracy.” The CPI would become the blueprint in which marketing strategies for future wars would be based upon. // Bernays applied the techniques he had learned in the CPI and, incorporating some of the ideas of Walter Lipmann, became an outspoken proponent of propaganda as a tool for democratic and corporate manipulation of the population.” (Source: https://www.amazon.com/Propaganda-Edward-Bernays-ebook/dp/B0097D76MG/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2NLE7CZI9MORU&keywords=propaganda+bernays&qid=1570053969&sprefix=propaganda%2Caps%2C210&sr=8-1 
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” Edward Bernays: author of Propaganda; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
12. For example, link them with conspiracy theorists, but see: https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/04/join-club-its-urgent.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-conspiracy-option.html
13. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-global-stanley-milgram-experiment.html https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/11/a-brief-analysis-of-edmonton-city.html
14. Added: “Repeat a lie [or partial lie] often enough and it becomes the truth”, is a law of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth [And mix-up a few truths with untruths, so everything appears as truth.]

Friday, May 7, 2021

“The True Function of a Lawyer“?

Mahatma Gandhi: I realized that the true function of a lawyer was to unite parties riven asunder. The lesson was so indelibly burnt into me that a large part of my time during the twenty years of practice as a lawyer was occupied in bringing about private compromises of hundreds of cases. I lost nothing thereby— not even money, certainly not my soul.1
In these recent days (with the aid of some lawyers), rules, orders, and mandates have been elevated above national and international statutory acknowledgements and guarantees of inalienable rights and freedoms, Thus, under color of law, we have seen thousands of illegal and unlawful (bullying) acts as more and more people buy into the “cult of passivity.” We were warned years ago that “Denying the danger of totalitarianism through passivity, may gradually surrender to its blandishments those who were initially afraid of it.”2 [And what is lockdown and doubling fines, if not enforced passivity?]

We were also warned years ago, by G.K. Chesterton, that:
The wisest thing in the world is to cry out before you are hurt. It is no good to cry out after you are hurt; especially after you are mortally hurt. People talk about the impatience of the populace; but sound historians know that most tyrannies have been possible because men moved too late. It is often essential to resist a tyranny before it exists. It is no answer to say, with a distant optimism, that the scheme is only in the air. A blow from a hatchet can only be parried while it is in the air.3
And yes, folks, we are mortally hurt. Mortally hurt because our “leaders” are not leading (save in the context of leading astray). They seem to have no awareness or courage. They have become power-abusing, fear-trapped order followers (OFs). They, the willful blind, are leading the fearful blind, and are disparaging all who recognize the déjà vus of tyranny. How many blows from the hatchet will we tolerate till there is nothing remaining but passivity — the ecstatic dream of every tyrant?

So back to the true function of a lawyer: How can there be true compromise (resolution and sustaining of values) if one party is the accusing, offended, power-party with unlimited resources (alleged government) while the other is an intimidated, accused, “offending,” ticketed, quarantined poor-party? So this is a call to poor-parties and their (pro bono) lawyers or non-lawyer counsellors-at-law. Do not consent to pay unlawful fines. Receive tickets with words such as: “I do not consent to pay this ticket and I accept it only as evidence of trespass by you and your superiors against inalienable rights and freedoms.”

If one is forced to comply under threat of assault or arrest, do not resist, but clearly state, more than once: 1) that your compliance is under duress; 2) that you reserve all your rights; and 3) that you will be launching a counter-claim for their breach of laws that are higher than rules, orders, and mandates, and for wrong, harm, and damages for the unproven alleged necessity of their actions. (Then immediately do so.)

For every unlawful ticket or rights infraction, without exception, file a counter-claim for wrong, harm, and damages. Name every public servant involved from the front-line OFs and PH agents to the top-brass, order-giving OFs. If OFs are not called to personally account for their actions, their complicity, their breach of service oaths, and surety bonds, this coup d'état and tyranny by the labcoats4 will continue to a bitter end, tragically, with the support of too many deceived, fearful complicit people as expressed by Etienne de LaBoétie.5

Every order-follower must be confronted with his / her complicity in wielding the hatchet of tyranny. Yes, many of them are good people just trying to keep their jobs,6 so our attitude should be one of compassion in the midst of accountability, but when the “law” is used unlawfully, we must learn to use it lawfully against itself, just a Jesus did7 — to apply “non-violence against the violent.”

IF lawyers of integrity will:
1) demand proof of every alleged “good faith” claim to the “reasonable and justified” test for every “temporary” suspension of rights and freedoms;8
2) question whether foreign-owned, for-profit service corporations or their agents have any lawful jurisdiction in Canada to make or enforce rules, orders, or mandates in Canada; and
3) help bring “parties riven asunder” into enlightenment respecting the sanctity of rights and freedoms even in an emergency, particularly an orchestrated emergency which could have been ascertained with a modicum of investigation, awareness, common sense, and historical knowledge;
then the abundant and overwhelming evidence of fraud and deception would reveal itself and “good faith” would crumble in the face of massive amounts of scientific and counter-narrative evidence.

Now to those who cannot comprehend or who despise resisters because OFs and MSM convince them to despise resisters and who insist, headline on headline, that we are in dire crisis, the truth is, we ARE in dire crisis — yea, in triple dire crisis:
1) from illness and death from a deliberately engineered and transmitted COVID “virus”;
2) from massive deceptions concerning the origin and nature of the “virus”; its transmissibility factors and causes; frauds in PCR testing; the vaccine agenda; the WO agenda, the science and history of Domination Systems; and
3) from the “cult of passivity” demanded in this unfolding, global tyranny.
If people would accept the prolific evidence of credible witnesses9 about worldwide conspiracies for Domination10 and then prosecute all — every complicit order-giver and order-follower advancing the tyranny, beginning with insiders — this plandemic would be over.

-----------------------------/
1. Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi's Life in His Own Words (Kindle Locations 462-464). Navajivan Trust. Kindle Edition. (Bold emphasis added.)
2. “The cult of passivity and so-called relaxation is one of the most dangerous developments of our times. Essentially, it too may represent a camouflage pattern, the double wish not to see the dangers and challenges of life and not to be seen. ... Silent, lonely relaxation with alcohol, sweets, the television screen, or a murder mystery may soothe the mind into a passivity that may gradually make it vulnerable to the seductive ideology of some feared enemy. Denying the danger of totalitarianism through passivity, may gradually surrender to its blandishments those who were initially afraid of it.” Meerloo, Dr. Joost A. M.. The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing (Kindle Locations 2783-2789). Hauraki Publishing. Kindle Edition. (Bold emphasis added.)
3. G.K. Chesterton, Eugenics and Other Evils (Chapter I, 1st paragraph), Cassell and Company, Limited London, New York, Toronto & Melbourne, 1922 at https://www.gutenberg.org/files/25308/25308-h/25308-h.htm
4. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/08/coup-detat-of-labcoats.html
5. https://voices-from-the-dust.blogspot.com/2021/03/006-secret-of-domination-6-6-6.html
6. However, remember Principle IV of Nuremberg:
Principle IV
Main article: Superior orders
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'". ... (Bold emphasis added.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles
7. https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2019/03/nonviolence-for-violent.html
8. Emergencies Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp.))
AND WHEREAS the Governor in Council, in taking such special temporary measures, would be subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ;and the Canadian Bill of Rights and must have regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, particularly with respect to those fundamental rights that are not to be limited or abridged even in a national emergency;  https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-1.html?wbdisable=true (Bold emphasis added)
— The Emergencies Act differs from the War Measures Act in two important ways:
   1. A declaration of an emergency by the Cabinet must be reviewed by Parliament
   2. Any temporary laws made under the act are subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Thus any attempt by the government to suspend the civil rights in Canada, even in an emergency, will be subject to the "reasonable and justified" test under section 1 of the Charter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergencies_Act
9. https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/04/join-club-its-urgent.html
10: Voices from the Dust: https://voices-from-the-dust.blogspot.com/

Monday, May 3, 2021

By What Authority??

(This exact email was sent in batches to 587 national and provincial public servants throughout Canada on May 1, 2021.)

To All Public Servants, provincial and national concerning:

Sitting Member of Parliament Threatened with Jail Time and Massive Fines!1

PLUS numerous other recent infractions of inalienable rights and freedoms.

By what authority do public servants act when threatening or censoring speech and opinion of other elected officials or others who do not share their opinions or narrative beliefs? when: arresting pastors? harassing congregations? jailing” church buildings? forbidding good Samaritan deeds? fining or changing locks on legitimate businesses? assaulting non-maskers? forcing quarantine of travelers in hotels or other facilities? ticketing peaceful protesters? causing wrong or harm or trespass? etc., etc. The abuses2 by “alleged authority” are escalating and alarming.

“By what authority” under the:
 Emergencies Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp.))
AND WHEREAS the Governor in Council, in taking such special temporary measures, would be subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ;and the Canadian Bill of Rights and must have regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, particularly with respect to those fundamental rights that are not to be limited or abridged even in a national emergency;3

 Criminal Code - R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46 (Section 176)
Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman
176 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who (a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or endeavours to obstruct or prevent an officiant from celebrating a religious or spiritual service or performing any other function in connection with their calling, or Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings
(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.4

 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights
[Two examples of 30]
Article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. {Vaxxers vs. Non-vaxxers?]
Article 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.5

 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms6

 Canadian Bill of Rights (S.C. 1960, c. 44)
Recognition and declaration of rights and freedoms
1 It is hereby recognized and declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,
(a) the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
(b) the right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the law;
(c) freedom of religion;
(d) freedom of speech;
(e) freedom of assembly and association; and
(f) freedom of the press.7

 Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-10) (and other police oaths)
Oaths
14 (1) Every member shall, before entering on the duties of the member’s office, take the oath of allegiance and the oaths set out in the schedule.
SCHEDULE(Section 14)
Oath of Office
I, ________________, solemnly swear that I will faithfully, diligently and impartially execute and perform the duties required of me as a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and will well and truly obey and perform all lawful orders and instructions that I receive as such, without fear, favour or affection of or toward any person. So help me God.8

 Lessons from the Nuremberg Trials and Principles
“I was just following my superior's orders”.9
 
Why are “authorities” putting enforcement personnel at risk for personal liability and criminal prosecution by ordering them to violate their service oaths and surety bonds in unlawful interference with inalienable rights and freedoms of the public recognized and encoded in both national and international law?

And lastly, have PHOs and their bosses complied with the PCR cycle threshold reporting guidelines10 and if not, why not? Enabling erroneous case counts is not acceptable and may incur civil and / or criminal liability. 
Sincerely,
SMSmith

----------------------------/
1. https://action4canada.com/update-actions-and-information-april-28th-2021/
2. https://action4canada.com/update-actions-and-information-april-28th-2021/
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/04/open-letter-to-reverend-greg.html
https://dejavu-timestwo.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-new-normal-samaritan.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/01/bully-culture.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/03/a-gift-horse.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-people-of-non-consent.html

https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2021/02/headlines-from-hell.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/11/against-conscience.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/11/a-brief-analysis-of-edmonton-city.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/12/open-letter-to-premier-brian-of-manitoba.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/08/coup-detat-of-labcoats.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-global-stanley-milgram-experiment.html
https://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/04/real-life-milgram-spe.html
3. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-1.html?wbdisable=true (Bold emphasis added)
4. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/Search/Search.aspx?txtS3archA11=religious&txtT1tl3=%22Criminal+Code%22&h1ts0n1y=0&ddC0nt3ntTyp3=Acts
5. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
6. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/
7. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/FullText.html
8. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/r-10/page-23.html#h-422682 (Bold emphasis added.)
9. Nuremberg Principle I 
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment. ... 
Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law, acted as Head of State or responsible government official, does not relieve him from responsibility under international law. ...
Principle IV
Main article: Superior orders
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'". ...
Principle VI ...
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles (Italic emphasis added.)
10PCR Cycle Thresholds: (Bold emphasis added.)

“The FDA has given lab manufacturers a wide latitude in determining the cycle threshold cut-off number of their qualitative tests to determine positive versus negative. These tests were approved under Emergency Use Authorization and have not been subjected to typical FDA scrutiny. With this in mind, the state of Florida has required all laboratories doing COVID testing to report the cycle threshold numbers used in qualitative and quantitative tests.

“So how does a qualitative RT-PCR test work? Basically, the manufacturer sets the test to turn off the cycling or amplification process when a certain number is hit. For a qualitative test set at 40, after 40 amplification cycles, if any viral material is detected, it turns off and is reported as positive. If none is detected, it would be reported as negative. If the number of amplification cycles was really 15 or 25, it would still run until it gets to 40 and be reported as positive.

“With these type of tests, it's critical to use an agreed-upon cycle threshold value such as 33 (CDC) or 35 (Dr. Fauci) rather than setting it at a potentially misleading 40 or 45. Many of the current tests in use are preset by the manufacturer to these higher numbers.

“The World Health Organization issued a notice last week telling the labs "the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise." Could this be a reason why many people test positive but remain asymptomatic? In that same memo, WHO said all labs should report the cycle threshold value to treating physicians.” at https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90508

 

BONUShttps://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2020/10/corruption-by-design.html

 
Creative Commons License
Déjà Vu ~ Times blog by SMSmith is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.