Wednesday, September 21, 2011

P-Con 002 ~ Not to Worry

(P-Con = sketch-stories exploring the déjà vu of Power, Publicity, PR, Profit, & Propoganda Concerns.)

All quotes following this P-Con sketch-story are from Angels Don’t Play This Haarp: Advances in Tesla Technology by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning © 1995, 2002 Earth Press, Anchorage, Alaska. This HAARP U.S. government/corporate partnership story is a classic (déjà vu) P-Con. It's time to give ear to concerned scientists like S2.


The HAARP [High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program] system is a tool, a radio frequency transmitter and broadcasting system of immense power. … “The heart of the program will be the development of a unique ionospheric heating capability to conduct the pioneering experiments required to adequately assess the potential of exploiting ionospheric enhancement technology for DoD (Dept. of Defense) purposes” (119).

My main objection to HAARP is that they intend to dump electromagnetic radiation into the upper atmosphere at very high power levels. … One way to visualize this power level is that a 10-billion watt generator, running continuously for one hour, would deliver a quantity of energy equal to that of a Hiroshima-size atomic bomb” (p. 109: physicist, Dr. Richard Williams).

[Adam] Trombly [American astrophysicist] pointed out a similarity between the decision to pulse several gigawatts into the ionosphere (HAARP) without knowing what will happen, and the first atomic weapon testing. Years after that test, physicist Robert Oppenheimer admitted that the scientists had not known what would happen when they set off the bomb – if the chain reaction was going to stop or keep on going” (p. 81).

Those big time experimenters admit that they don’t know what will happen when they push ionospheric heating experiments into the next level of effects. They seem to be excited about the macho adventure of passing the next “threshold of effects” in the ionosphere, and do not hesitate to pump gigawatts of power up there and intentionally accelerate particles in the ionosphere to “relativistic” speeds – nearly the speed of light (p. 76).

Dr. Phillip Callahan, an expert on radio systems/electronics as well as biology: …“They don’t know a hill of beans about the ionosphere! There’s nothing wrong with studying Mother Nature and then copying her. But they’re trying to jam up the system, that’s the problem. … Nobody’s studying [biological effects]; they just sit there and say ‘there’s no harm in it’. Out of sight, out of mind” (pp. 184-5).

Dr. Robert Becker: “the military establishment still believes that the survival of the military organism is worth the sacrifice of the lives and health of large segments of the American population” (p. 188).

-----------/
See also: http://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2010/02/technology-servant-or-master.html
http://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2010/01/proliferation-of-masters.html
http://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2010/01/vc-beware-spokesman.html
http://dejavu-times.blogspot.com/2009/07/to-loyalists-everywhere.html

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Some Scientific Truths! More or Less*

(*Gleaned from CERTAIN scientists who shall remain unnamed in memory of Schrödinger’s unnamed cat.[1])

 If certain scientists assume that something is possibly probable—it is MORE than possibly probable—IT IS (unless, of course, that something happens to be God).
 If certain scientists assume something is improbable—it is MORE than improbable—IT IS NOT (as in God)—with the ONE possible exception being our improbable Universe which has been put to the “pinch” test and passed (more or less).
 Assumptions do not need testing; only hypotheses and theories do (more or less).
 Assumed sets of laws result in all sorts of Possibles and Probables with a unified field and/or theory possibly probable in the near future (or past or present, if you believe in imaginary numbers).
 If certain quantum scientists predict something, it will appear (somewhere); and since John the Revelator was not a quantum scientist, there is no cause to worry. (Corollary: If one is looking for something, one will possibly/probably find it, UNLESS, AGAIN, OF COURSE, that something should happen to be God—BECAUSE God is both impossible AND improbable, without exception.)
 Catastrophism was impossibly improbable for certain scientists until comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 was observed doing something possibly probable in July 1994. Now, certain scientists are gradually reconsidering. (Random thought: What if John the Revelator was scribing for an undercover, cosmic/quantum scientist?)
 Being unable to satisfactorily explain our mysterious universe, certain [verbose and lactose-intolerant?] scientists have taken to creating their own.
 Multi-universes (sometimes called The Landscape) have been created by certain scientists (sometimes out of nothing) to explain the inexplicable and bear witness of the unobservable. This is not to say alternate universes/dimensions don’t exit—just that science can’t see them—only think, infer, and talk about them as a way to create assumptions and/or explore persistent mysteries.
 If science has enough alternate universes, imaginary numbers, and time, everything will eventually be explainable (though perhaps not observable).
 The supernatural is too unnatural—HOWEVER quantum superposition [2] is an amazingly mysterious (believable) departure from the norm.
 To CERTAIN scientists, it IS absolutely true that there is NO absolute truth. And that’s the absolute truth.

------------------/
[1] Explanation in brief: Schrödinger had a paradoxical thought about a cat, but never actually created a live one or triggered the demise of a dead one (insofar as we know). Had Schrödinger given a little more thought to the cat in his “Copenhagen” critique, it is highly probable he would have named the imagined tabby, Limbo. For greater detail on the unnamed cat, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger's_cat
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Suggestion

~~
If Pluto* could be demoted from its former status in our planetary system, perhaps we could demote plutocracy** in our global, economic one.

-----------------/
*   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto
** A system of government in which the rich rule; a ruling class of wealthy people.
 
Creative Commons License
Déjà Vu ~ Times blog by SMSmith is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.